|
|
|
|||
|
The
QIO for |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|||
|
QIO TRANSMITTAL SERIES ISSUE: Hospital Payment Monitoring Program - Printable
pages The goal of the
Hospital Payment Monitoring Program (HPMP) is to help maintain and improve
the fiscal integrity of the Medicare program by ensuring correct payments for
services furnished by general acute care hospitals under the DRG prospective
payment system. Hospitals can find
more information about HPMP as well as various tools at www.HPMPResources.org, a national
resource for payment error prevention. Medical Record
Review Throughout
the contract period, a federally-contracted clinical data abstraction center
(CDAC) reviews a sample of medical records from each state to identify
potential payment errors. The CDAC
requests these records directly from the hospitals. Approximately 750 records are requested from each state for
this sample each year. After the CDAC
completes a screening review, those charts flagged as involving potential
utilization, DRG or billing problems are referred to the appropriate QIO for
a complete case review. Potential
quality of care concerns are also referred to the QIOs. All
case specific review for HPMP is performed in accordance with NHCQF review
processes and includes physician consultant review as appropriate. Hospitals and/or attending physicians have
the opportunity to comment on any potential denials for medically unnecessary
admissions or procedures, DRG changes or quality concerns. Cases with
confirmed payment errors are submitted to the fiscal intermediary for payment
adjustment. The final results of the
QIO review are forwarded to CMS to maintain a national database on payment
errors. Refer
to the DRG Validation, Utilization Review and Quality Review sections of this
Transmittal Series for more detailed information on the review process. Data
Analysis and Project Development
CMS provides each QIO
with quarterly hospital specific reports from claims data that allow QIOs to
perform outlier monitoring. The reports
cover various target areas identified by CMS as potentially at risk for
payment errors. The reports provide
hospital specific and statewide comparative data for each of the target
areas. NHCQF shares the Program for
Evaluating Payment Errors Electronic Reports (PEPPER) with the individual
hospitals to assist them in performing their own monitoring and auditing of
payment patterns. NHCQF also assesses
review outcomes to identify any trends potentially indicative of payment
errors. If trends are identified
through analysis of the claims data and/or review outcomes, NHCQF develops
focused projects that are submitted to CMS for approval prior to
implementation. If
NHCQF suspects that payment errors involve fraud or deliberate abusive
attempts to inappropriately enhance reimbursement, NHCQF is contractually
required to refer the matter to the Office of the Inspector General for
investigation. June
2006 Next
Chapter: Utilization Review
Process |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Copyright © 2005 Northeast Health Care Quality Foundation, all rights
reserved |
||||