Northeast Health Care Quality FoundationNortheast Health Care Quality Foundation

 

 

 

The QIO for Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont

 

 

 

 

 

  NEXT

                 

QIO TRANSMITTAL SERIES

ISSUE: Quality Review Process  -  Printable pages

The Foundation will utilize various tools to identify potential quality of care problems.  Objective measures such as CMS's generic quality of care categories and the ISD discharge screens will be used by the Foundation's Case Review Specialists on cases being reviewed which require quality/discharge review.  The use of registered nurses as Case Review Specialists also affords the Foundation the benefit of identifying potential quality of care problems not covered by a generic quality or discharge screen.

Cases with potential quality of care problems identified by a Case Review Specialist will be reviewed by a QIO Physician Consultant.  This Physician Consultant will be, to the extent possible, of the same specialty as the physician under review.

On any case where the Physician Consultant raises a concern that requires further review, an initial notification will be sent to the involved physician (including residents and interns) and to the provider affording them an opportunity to respond to the issue(s) raised.  Because potential and confirmed quality concerns require the attention of both the provider and physician concerned, the notice is to be sent to both the involved physician and the provider where the services were performed.  Notices which are sent to the provider will be sent to both the Administrator and the Chief of Staff.  The Administrator may request that his/her copy of the notice be routinely sent to an individual who will represent the Administrator.  This request must be provided to the Foundation in writing.  However, the Chief of Staff copy must be sent to the hospital's Chief of Staff.  An alternative representative will not be allowed.

The physician, Chief of Staff and Administrative staff representative are encouraged to consult with one another to formulate a coordinated response that addresses the concern(s) raised.

The potential quality notice will:

 

1.                  Include a brief description of the quality concern;

2.                  Include an explanation of the potential or actual adverse outcome;

3.                  Advise the involved physician and provider of their right to submit written comments/additional information on the case and/or to request an opportunity to discuss the case within twenty (20) days of the date of the initial notification; and

4.                  Advise the involved physician and provider that failure to respond/provide additional information will result in the confirmation of the quality concern and final notification.

The physician(s) and/or a physician hospital representative may discuss the case with a QIO Physician Consultant.  If such discussion is desired, it must be indicated in the written response.  

The Foundation will make arrangements for a Physician Consultant to contact the physician(s) requesting discussion.

A non-physician hospital representative may discuss the case with a Foundation staff member.  If such discussion is desired, it must be indicated in the written response.  The Foundation will then contact the hospital party requesting discussion during routine business hours.

If the physician and/or provider does not respond, the potential quality concern raised on the case will become the final QIO determination and a final notification to this effect will be issued.

If the physician and/or provider agrees with the Physician Consultant about the quality issue raised, it will become the final QIO determination and a final notification to this effect will be issued.

If the physician and/or provider does provide additional information, the information will be provided to a QIO Physician Consultant for consideration/review.  This may be the same Physician Consultant who initially reviewed the case.

If the review with the additional information provided by the physician and/or provider results in the determination that no quality problem exists for the case, the review is concluded and a final notification of no quality concern will be sent.  This final notification to the physician and provider will:

1.                  Advise the parties that review of the additional information submitted has resulted in the determination that no quality concern exists on the case; and

2.                  Advise the parties that the case is closed and that no further action will be taken on the case.

If the review with the additional information provided by the physician and/or provider results in the determination that a quality concern exists on the case, a final determination notice to this effect will be issued.  This notice will:

1.                  Advise the parties of the identified concern, including a description of and explanation of the concern;

2.                  Advise the parties of any QIO determination of action(s) to be taken by the parties to address the problem;

3.                  Advise the parties of any QIO immediate action to be taken as a result of the determination; and

4.                  Advise the parties of the right to request (in writing) a re-review of the quality determination within 30 days of receipt of the final determination.

If a physician or provider dissatisfied with a final quality concern determination requests a re-review of that determination, the request must be made in writing.  The case will be reviewed by a QIO Physician Consultant who was not involved in the initial determination.  The physician or provider does not need to submit new information to be entitled to a re-review.

The Physician Consultant will:

1.                  Review any additional information furnished by the physician or provider and re-review the final determination about the quality concerns;

2.                  Make a final determination regarding the quality concern(s) and the source(s) of the quality concern(s).

A notice of Re-review of Quality Concern will be sent to the physician and provider for every case where a re-review is requested.  The re-review is an administrative, not a regulatory process.  No additional review or appeal beyond the re-review of the final quality concern is available.

November 2002

Next Chapter: Beneficiary Requested Quality of Care Reviews

 

 

Northeast Health Care Quality FoundationHome

Copyright © 2005 Northeast Health Care Quality Foundation, all rights reserved